Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 100
Filter
1.
Am J Public Health ; 112(2): 248-254, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35080945

ABSTRACT

Mixed-race African German and Vietnamese German children were born around 1921, when troops drawn from the French colonial empire occupied the Rhineland. These children were forcibly sterilized in 1937. Racial anthropologists had denounced them as "Rhineland Bastards," collected details on them, and persuaded the Nazi public health authorities to sterilize 385 of them. One of the adolescents later gave public interviews about his experiences. Apart from Hans Hauck, very few are known by name, and little is known about how their sterilization affected their lives. None of the 385 received compensation from the German state, either as victims of coerced sterilization or as victims of Nazi medical research. The concerned human geneticists went unprosecuted. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(2):248-254. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306593).


Subject(s)
Clinical Medicine/history , National Socialism/history , Sterilization, Involuntary/history , Adolescent , Black People/statistics & numerical data , History, 20th Century , Human Experimentation/history , Humans , Prejudice , Sterilization, Reproductive/history , White People/statistics & numerical data
2.
Hist Sci ; 60(1): 18-40, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29644879

ABSTRACT

Scholars such as Nancy Leys Stepan, Alexandra Minna Stern, Marius Turda and Aaron Gillette have all argued that the rejection of coerced sterilization was a defining feature of "Latin" eugenic theory and practice. These studies highlight the influence of neo-Lamarckism in this development not only in Latin America but also in parts of Europe in the first half of the twentieth century. This article builds upon this historiographical framework to examine an often-neglected site of Latin American eugenic knowledge production: Chile. By focusing on Chilean eugenicists' understandings of environment and coerced sterilization, this article argues that there was no uniquely Latin objection to the practice initially. In fact, Chilean eugenicists echoed concerns of eugenicists from a variety of locations, both "mainstream" and Latin, who felt that sterilization was not the most effective way to ensure the eugenic improvement of national populations. Instead, the article contends that it was not until the implementation of the 1933 German racial purity laws, which included coerced sterilization legislation, that Chilean eugenicists began to define their objections to the practice as explicitly Latin. Using a variety of medical texts which appeared in popular periodicals as well as professional journals, this article reveals the complexity of eugenic thought and practice in Chile in the early twentieth century.


Subject(s)
Eugenics , Sterilization, Reproductive , Chile , Eugenics/history , Europe , Humans , Sterilization , Sterilization, Reproductive/history
3.
Med Hist ; 64(2): 173-194, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32284633

ABSTRACT

This article examines female sterilisation practices in early twentieth-century Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. It argues that the medical profession, particularly obstetricians and psychiatrists, used debates over the issue to solidify its moral and political standing during two political moments of Brazilian history: when the Brazilian government separated church and state in the 1890s and when Getúlio Vargas's authoritarian regime of the late 1930s renewed alliances with the Catholic church. Shifting notions of gender, race, and heredity further shaped these debates. In the late nineteenth century, a unified medical profession believed that female sterilisation caused psychiatric degeneration in women. By the 1930s, however, the arrival of eugenics caused a divergence amongst physicians. Psychiatrists began supporting eugenic sterilisation to prevent degeneration - both psychiatric and racial. Obstetricians, while arguing that sterilisation no longer caused mental disturbances in women, rejected it as a eugenic practice in regard to race. For obstetricians, the separation of sex from motherhood was more dangerous than any racial 'impurities', both phenotypical and psychiatric. At the same time, a revitalised Brazilian Catholic church rejected eugenics and sterilisation point blank, and its renewed ties with the Vargas regime blocked the medical implementation of any eugenic sterilisation laws. Brazilian women, nonetheless, continued to access the procedure, regardless of the surrounding legal and medical proscriptions.


Subject(s)
Catholicism/history , Eugenics/history , Obstetrics/history , Physicians/history , Religion and Medicine , Sterilization, Reproductive/history , Brazil , Eugenics/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Gender Identity , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Humans , Mental Disorders/etiology , Mental Disorders/history , Physician's Role/history , Physicians/ethics , Political Systems/history , Psychiatry/history , Sex Characteristics , Sterilization, Reproductive/ethics , Sterilization, Reproductive/legislation & jurisprudence , Sterilization, Reproductive/psychology
6.
J Hist Med Allied Sci ; 72(3): 272-301, 2017 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28873982

ABSTRACT

Transcervical sterilization is a non-surgical method of permanent female sterilization that is widely used and critically discussed. A review of the historiography of the method reveals that instances of its coercive use are not included in the historical account. This study offers a reexamination of the work of Carl Clauberg and Hans-Joachim Lindemann, to more deeply contextualize within the framework of current usage the coercive use of transcervical sterilization during the Third Reich and in postwar Germany. This inquiry is based on postwar criminal trial records on Clauberg, and on archival documents detailing Lindemann's activities in 1979. A comparative analysis examines arguments by medical historian Karl-Heinz Roth, and identifies shared characteristics and differences between Clauberg and Lindemann, their methods and scientific connections. The results demonstrate that the technique of transcervical sterilization has an abusive potential that may be explained as a function of the person of the physician, of the scientific method itself, and of societal and political influences. The analysis supports the argument that insights from the cases of Clauberg and Lindemann are transferrable geographically and over time, and have the potential to inform current medical practice, such as transcervical sterilization with the Essure device, whose historiographic exploration remains a desideratum.


Subject(s)
Human Experimentation , Hysteroscopy/adverse effects , Sterilization, Reproductive/history , Sterilization, Tubal/history , War Crimes/history , Female , Germany , History, 20th Century , Humans , Male , Pregnancy , Sterilization, Reproductive/adverse effects
7.
Am J Public Health ; 107(1): 50-54, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27854540

ABSTRACT

From 1919 to 1952, approximately 20 000 individuals were sterilized in California's state institutions on the basis of eugenic laws that sought to control the reproductive capacity of people labeled unfit and defective. Using data from more than 19 000 sterilization recommendations processed by state institutions over this 33-year period, we provide the most accurate estimate of living sterilization survivors. As of 2016, we estimate that as many as 831 individuals, with an average age of 87.9 years, are alive. We suggest that California emulate North Carolina and Virginia, states that maintained similar sterilization programs and recently have approved monetary compensation for victims. We discuss the societal obligation for redress of this historical injustice and recommend that California seriously consider reparations and full accountability.


Subject(s)
Compensation and Redress , Eugenics/history , Persons with Mental Disabilities/history , Sterilization, Reproductive/history , California , Family Planning Policy/history , History, 20th Century , Humans
8.
Can Bull Med Hist ; 33(1): 59-81, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27344903

ABSTRACT

In 1917, the Ontario government appointed the Royal Commission on the Care and Control of the Mentally Defective and Feeble-Minded, headed by Justice Frank Hodgins. Its final report made wide-ranging recommendations regarding the segregation of feeble-minded individuals, restrictions on marriage, the improvement of psychiatric facilities, and the reform of the court system, all matters of great concern to the eugenics movement. At the same time, however, it refrained from using explicitly eugenic vocabulary and ignored the question of sterilization. This article explores the role the commission played in the trajectory of eugenics in Ontario (including the province's failure to pass sterilization legislation) and considers why its recommendations were disregarded.


Subject(s)
Eugenics/history , Intellectual Disability/history , Eugenics/legislation & jurisprudence , History, 20th Century , Intellectual Disability/therapy , Ontario , Sterilization, Involuntary/history , Sterilization, Involuntary/legislation & jurisprudence , Sterilization, Reproductive/history , Sterilization, Reproductive/legislation & jurisprudence
10.
Dynamis (Granada) ; 36(1): 191-209, 2016.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-151092

ABSTRACT

El rejuvenecimiento fue un capítulo de la máxima importancia en el desarrollo de la endocrinología a nivel mundial en la década de 1920. Este trabajo explora la recepción de estas técnicas en Chile. Desde finales del siglo XIX, la Revista Médica de Chile incorporó referencias a los experimentos con preparados de glándulas endocrinas que se estaban realizando en Europa en aquel momento. A partir de 1920 se inició una apropiación en Chile de los experimentos del austríaco Eugen Steinach, con figuras destacadas como el profesor italiano Juan Noé Crevani y el joven estudiante chileno Ottmar Wilhelm. Entre 1922 y 1924, Wilhelm desarrolló una serie de experimentos en los cuerpos de perros, toros, cerdos, ratas y pacientes de la Junta de Beneficencia, a través de la llamada operación Steinach, que consistía en la sección del canal eferente de uno de los testículos. La política de patronazgo científico del profesor Noé y la estrategia de sucesión en el campo de Wilhelm, llevaron a este último a ocupar una cátedra en la naciente Escuela de Medicina de la Universidad de Concepción, a la edad de 25 años. Desde esa posición, la figura de Wilhelm fue fundamental en el desarrollo de una línea de investigación endocrinológica que logró posicionar a la Universidad de Concepción como un polo de desarrollo científico, fortalecido con la llegada de otro discípulo de Steinach a Chile, el profesor letón Alejandro Lipschütz (AU)


Rejuvenation was a chapter of critical importance for the worldwide development of endocrinology in the 1920s. This work explores the acceptance of these techniques in Chile. Starting in the late 19th century, the Chilean Medical Journal (Revista Médica de Chile) incorporated references to experiments with endocrine gland preparations that were being conducted in Europe at the time. An appropriation of the experiments by the Austrian Eugen Steinach began in 1920, with prominent figures such as the Italian professor Juan Noe Crevani and the young Chilean student Ottmar Wilhelm. Between 1922 and 1924, Wilhelm developed a series of experiments on dogs, bulls, pigs, rats and Welfare Board patients through the so-called Steinach operation, which consisted of the sectioning of the efferent channel in one of the testicles. Professor Noe’s scientific patronage policy and Wilhelm’s strategy of succession in the field led the latter to hold a chair in the new School of Medicine of Universidad de Concepción at the age of 25. From this position, the figure of Wilhelm was fundamental for the development of a line of endocrinological research that was able to position Universidad de Concepción as a scientific development centre, which was strengthened by the arrival of another disciple of Steinach in Chile, the Latvian professor Alejandro Lipschütz (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Rejuvenation , Endocrinology/history , Eugenics/history , Eugenics/methods , Sterilization, Reproductive/history , Sterilization, Reproductive/methods , Endocrine System Diseases/history , Medicine , Chile
11.
Urologe A ; 54(4): 560-6, 2015 Apr.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25895568

ABSTRACT

The German Law for Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring (Das Gesetz zur Verhütung erbkranken Nachwuchses) was enacted in 1933. It allowed forced sterilization of patients who had been diagnosed with certain so-called hereditary diseases. Drawing on patient files from the city of Göttingen, this article provides new research results about the practice of forced sterilization of men in the Third Reich. Results show that around 1000 men were sentenced to sterilization by the local hereditary health court (Erbgesundheitsgericht). In this article, some aspects of the operation and "refertilization" are reconstructed.


Subject(s)
Eugenics/history , National Socialism/history , Sterilization, Involuntary/history , Sterilization, Reproductive/history , Surgery Department, Hospital/history , Germany , History, 20th Century , Humans , Male
12.
Clin Obstet Gynecol ; 58(2): 409-17, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25811128

ABSTRACT

The US government developed a Medicaid Consent to Sterilization form in the mid-1970s to protect vulnerable populations from coerced sterilization. US health care practices have evolved significantly since that time. The form, however, has not changed, and may be preventing access to desired services for the same vulnerable populations it was originally created to protect. This paper discusses the relevant historical, practical use, ethical, and advocacy considerations of the Medicaid sterilization consent form and proposes changes to make the form more pertinent to today's medical environment.


Subject(s)
Health Policy , Reproductive Health , Sterilization, Reproductive , Female , Government Regulation , Health Policy/history , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , History, 20th Century , Humans , Male , Patient Advocacy/trends , Reproductive Health/ethics , Reproductive Health/history , Sterilization, Reproductive/ethics , Sterilization, Reproductive/history , Sterilization, Reproductive/legislation & jurisprudence , Sterilization, Reproductive/methods , United States
13.
N C Med J ; 76(1): 59-63, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25621486

ABSTRACT

Medical necessity may lead to secondary sterilization of individuals with intellectual disabilities, but legal statutes mandate that certain procedures be followed in these cases. In this article, we present a case of medically necessary sterilization of an individual with intellectual disability, and we discuss important legal statutes that guide this practice in North Carolina.


Subject(s)
Down Syndrome/psychology , Hysterectomy/legislation & jurisprudence , Informed Consent By Minors , Intellectual Disability/psychology , Menorrhagia/surgery , Mental Competency , Sterilization, Involuntary/legislation & jurisprudence , Adolescent , Down Syndrome/complications , Female , History, 20th Century , Humans , Intellectual Disability/complications , Menorrhagia/complications , North Carolina , Sterilization, Involuntary/history , Sterilization, Reproductive/history , Sterilization, Reproductive/legislation & jurisprudence
14.
Can Bull Med Hist ; 31(1): 165-87, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24909023

ABSTRACT

The history of eugenic sterilization connotes draconian images of coerced and involuntary procedures robbing men and women of their reproductive health. While eugenics programs often fit this characterization, there is another, smaller, and less obvious legacy of eugenics that arguably contributed to a more empowering image of reproductive health. Sexual sterilization surgeries as a form of contraception began to gather momentum alongside eugenics programs in the middle of the 20th century and experiences among prairie women serve as an illustrative example. Alberta maintained its eugenics program from 1929 to 1972 and engaged in thousands of eugenic sterilizations, but by the 1940s middle-class married women pressured their Albertan physicians to provide them with sterilization surgeries to control fertility, as a matter of choice. The multiple meanings and motivations behind this surgery introduced a moral quandary for physicians, which encourages medical historians to revisit the history of eugenics and its relationship to the contemporaneous birth control movement.


Subject(s)
Contraception/history , Eugenics/history , Sterilization, Reproductive/history , Alberta , Eugenics/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , History, 20th Century , Humans , Marriage , Social Class , Sterilization, Involuntary/history , Sterilization, Involuntary/legislation & jurisprudence , Sterilization, Reproductive/legislation & jurisprudence , Women
15.
Can Bull Med Hist ; 31(1): 189-211, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24909024

ABSTRACT

Nonconsensual sterilization is usually seen as the by-product of a classist and racist society; disability is ignored. This article examines the 1973 sterilization of two young black girls from Alabama and other precedent-setting court cases involving the sterilization of "mentally retarded" white women to make disability more central to the historical analysis of sterilization. It analyzes the concept of mental retardation and the appeal of a surgical solution to birth control, assesses judicial deliberations over the "right to choose" contraceptive sterilization when the capacity to consent is in doubt, and reflects on the shadow of eugenics that hung over the sterilization debate in the 1970s and 1980s.


Subject(s)
Eugenics/history , Sterilization, Reproductive/history , Eugenics/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , History, 20th Century , Humans , Persons with Mental Disabilities , Sterilization, Reproductive/legislation & jurisprudence , United States
16.
World J Urol ; 32(4): 1055-60, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24135916

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The first full-time professorship for urology at a German university was established in 1937 and in 1942, a rare teaching qualification (Habilitation) for urology was granted, both at the prestigious Berlin University. At the same time, nearly a third of all physicians who worked in the field of urology were classified as "non-Aryan" according to Nazi race laws and were forced out of their profession and their homeland. Many of them committed suicide or, if they refused to flee, were murdered in concentration camps. German urologists also contributed to compulsory sterilization of men according to the "law for the prevention of hereditarily diseased offspring" between 1934 and 1945. METHODS: Historical sources on the history of urology in Nazi Germany were reviewed and analyzed. These include textbooks and medical journals from the 1930s and 1940s, as well as files from different state and university archives. RESULTS: For urologists, the changing political environment in Germany after 1933 offered possibilities to assert their personal and professional interests. Unfortunately, in many cases, moral principles were thrown overboard, and physicians advanced their own careers and the specialty of urology at the expense of their patients and their Jewish colleagues. CONCLUSION: Under national socialism, German urologists backed Nazi health and race policies and in exchange gained further professionalization for their specialty, including university positions and increased independence from surgery. Only in recent years has this chapter of German urology's past become a topic of debate among members of the professional society.


Subject(s)
National Socialism/history , Urology/history , Biomedical Research/history , Germany , Health Policy/history , History, 20th Century , Humans , Specialization/history , Sterilization, Reproductive/history
17.
São Paulo; EMS. NCTVC; 12 mar. 2013. Vídeo (28:27 min.).(Insight - Gerando Novas Ideias).
Monography in Portuguese | Sec. Munic. Saúde SP, CEP-Producao, Sec. Munic. Saúde SP, CGP-Producao, Sec. Munic. Saúde SP, EMS-Producao, Sec. Munic. Saúde SP, Sec. Munic. Saúde SP | ID: sms-6527

ABSTRACT

Nesta edição do programa recebeu Sérgio Yamamoto, médico ginecologista do Hospital e Maternidade Leonor Mendes de Barros, para falar sobre esterilização feminina. O convidado desenvolveu a pesquisa com o tema: "Esterilização cirúrgica feminina no Brasil: controvérsias na interpretação e desafios na aplicação da Lei 9263". A pesquisa qualitativa entrevistou 27 profissionais de saúde divididos em médicos, assistentes sociais, enfermeiros e psicólogos. Estes servidores formam um grupo multiprofissional responsável pelo atendimento de mulheres que procuram a esterilização. Um dos grandes problemas para a realização da laqueadura ou vasectomia no Brasil é a intervenção da igreja católica que se posiciona contra métodos contraceptivos. Para que não haja arrependimento, é importante que a mulher ou o casal, procure o serviço de planejamento familiar nas unidades de saúde antes de realizar a esterilização. Um dos principais resultados apontados pela pesquisa é a divergência existente na interpretação da lei por parte dos profissionais que realizam este serviço. O artigo mais importante da Lei 9263 afirma que qualquer mulher maior de 23 anos ou com pelo menos dois filhos vivos pode realizar a esterilização. A interpretação da lei causa polêmicas e dificulta o trabalho e a realização do serviço.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Sterilization, Reproductive/history , Sterilization, Reproductive/legislation & jurisprudence , Family Development Planning , Health Personnel , Feminism , Contraception , Brazil
19.
Med Hist ; 56(2): 237-54, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23002295

ABSTRACT

The physician and sexologist Albert Moll, from Berlin, was one of the main protagonists within the German discourse on the opportunities and dangers of social engineering, by eugenic interventions into human life in general, as well as into reproductive hygiene and healthcare policy in particular. One of the main sexological topics that were discussed intensively during the late-Wilhelminian German Reich and the Weimar Republic was the question of the legalisation of voluntary and compulsory sterilisations on the basis of medical, social, eugenic, economic or criminological indications. As is clear from Moll's conservative principles of medical ethics, and his conviction that the genetic knowledge required for eugenically indicated sterilisations was not yet sufficiently elaborated, he had doubts and worries about colleagues who were exceedingly zealous about these surgical sterilisations--especially Gustav Boeters from Saxony.


Subject(s)
Dissent and Disputes/history , Ethics, Medical/history , Eugenics/history , Sterilization, Reproductive/history , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/history , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/prevention & control , Germany , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Humans , Sterilization, Reproductive/legislation & jurisprudence
20.
Am J Public Health ; 102(10): 1822-5, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22897531

ABSTRACT

In the 1970s, concern about coercive sterilization of low-income and minority women in the United States led the US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare to create strict regulations for federally funded sterilization procedures. Although these policies were instituted to secure informed consent and protect women from involuntary sterilization, there are significant data indicating that these policies may not, in fact, ensure that consent is truly informed and, further, may prevent many low-income women from getting a desired sterilization procedure. Given the alarmingly high rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, especially among low-income populations, we feel that restrictive federal sterilization policies should be reexamined and modified to simultaneously ensure informed decision-making and honor women's reproductive choices.


Subject(s)
Federal Government , Financing, Government/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Policy , Sterilization, Reproductive/economics , Female , History, 20th Century , Humans , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Sterilization, Reproductive/history , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...